Katherine Allen's Record

Before You Vote, Review the Transcripts

Katherine Allen Weaver is running for 324th District Family Court Judge. Her campaign emphasizes her experience as court-appointed amicus attorney representing children's best interests.

Tarrant County voters deserve to review public court transcripts from cases where she served in that role.

All information on this site comes from public court records

This voter education site is not connected to any pending litigation.

In Her Own Words

From public court transcript

"I do believe that it handicaps the rest of us... to grant her so much time."

— Katherine Allen, Court Transcript

Context: Katherine Allen made this statement when a mother with documented disabilities requested accommodations to present evidence about her child's medical needs. Despite claiming on her campaign website that her personal experience with her son's learning differences has "deepened her understanding of the unique challenges faced by many families," her words in court tell a different story.

Campaign Promises vs. Reality

What she says vs. what the transcripts show

Her Campaign ClaimsThe Court Record Shows

"Entrusted by the court to represent the best interests of children"

Objected to medical records documenting child's eating disorder

Result: Child's BMI dropped 14.94 percentile points

"Personal experience has deepened her understanding of unique challenges"

Stated disability accommodations "handicap the rest of us"

Vol. 19, Court Transcript

"Committed to keeping children safe"

Multiple families report non-response to safety concerns and blocked evidence

Documentation available upon request

"Respecting parental rights"

Told mother she "doesn't get to just come in here and Willy-Nilly decide what she's going to complain about"

Vol. 19, p. 171

Documented Case Examples

Multiple families, similar patterns from public court records

Her Campaign

"Katherine's expertise... she is frequently appointed as an amicus attorney, entrusted by the court to represent the best interests of children."

The Court Record

Case 1 • May 7, 2024 (Vol. 20, pp. 181-182)

Mother attempted to introduce Cook Children's medical records documenting child's eating disorder.

Katherine Allen objected.

Court sustained objection. Medical records excluded.

Result: Mother unable to rebut testimony she was fabricating conditions. Child's BMI percentile dropped from 40th to 25th over 9 months.

Her Campaign

"Katherine is committed to keeping children safe, respecting parental rights, and ensuring timely, lawful permanency."

The Court Record

Case 2 • Case No. 360-752313-24 (Tarrant County)

Child removed from mother's care at 2 weeks old

Result: Breastfeeding terminated due to lack of access and milk production.

Pattern documented:

  • Control through supervision gatekeeping - restricting who may supervise visits
  • Demanded access to mother's psychiatrist/counselor as prerequisite for recommendations
  • $3,150 billed during period of escalating restrictions
  • Third-party supervisor affirmed mother was "not a danger" - restrictions continued

Her Campaign

"A proud mother, Katherine's son navigates learning differences, including ADHD and dyslexia. This personal experience has deepened her understanding of the unique challenges faced by many families."

The Court Record

Case 1 • May 7, 2024 (Vol. 19, p. 171)

When mother mentioned disability discrimination:

Katherine Allen: "She has not provided any experts in her disclosures."

When mother tried to explain objections had blocked expert designation:

Katherine Allen: "She doesn't get to just come in here and Willy-Nilly decide what she's going to complain about."

Pattern Across Multiple Families

Additional families report similar experiences

Documented Patterns:

  • Non-response to safety concerns
  • Blocked medical evidence
  • Children unable to reach their attorney
  • Restrictions imposed without clear findings

Common Elements:

  • Early separation of infants/young children
  • Medical information used as leverage
  • Supervision control as gatekeeping mechanism
  • Billing escalation during restriction periods

Share Your Experience

If you or your family have experienced Katherine Allen as amicus attorney in a Tarrant County family court case, your documentation may help voters make informed decisions.

Multiple families have reported similar patterns. Your experience matters. All submissions are reviewed confidentially and used only for voter education purposes.

Opens in new window • Confidential submission form

Why This Matters

Family court judges make life-altering decisions for children and families.

An amicus attorney's role is to investigate thoroughly, communicate with children, and advocate for their best interests—not to block evidence or create procedural barriers.

These transcripts raise questions voters should consider before entrusting judicial power to this candidate.

About This Site

This site was created by concerned Texas families who have experienced Katherine Allen as court-appointed amicus attorney in Tarrant County family court cases.

All materials presented are from public court records. Complete transcript excerpts are available upon request.

Multiple families have documented similar patterns in cases where Katherine Allen served as amicus attorney. If you have experienced similar issues, your documentation may help voters make informed decisions.

Legal Disclaimer:

This website presents factual information from public court records for voter education purposes. It is not connected to any pending litigation and does not constitute legal advice. All claims are supported by documented court transcripts.

Contact

For transcript requests or to share your experience

Primary Election Date:

March 3, 2026

Early voting begins February 17, 2026